Search here for conference announcements, calls for papers, fellowships and more.
Do you have an event you’d like to announce? A call for papers for a conference? Email all details to [email protected].
International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics
On behalf of the Organization Committee, we are pleased to invite you to the International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics (ICFAEC 2018) which will be held on 27-28th April 2018 in Alanya, Turkey.
ICFAEC 2018 aims at disseminating new knowledge in the field economics and provides a forum for deliberations and exchange of knowledge among academics, organizations, and researchers. ICFAEC 2018 encourages submission of theoretical and empirical papers in the different domains of food and agricultural economics and related disciplines, within and across different levels of analysis. ICFAEC 2018 focuses on are:
- Food Economics
- Agricultural Economics
- Food Policy
- Agricultural Management
- Farm Management
- Rural Development
- Sustainable Development
- Farming Systems
- Agricultural Policy
- Socio-economic Aspects
- Food Marketing
- Rural & Agricultural Sociology
- Agricultural Extension
- Financing credits and agricultural subsidies
- Logistics of agricultural production
- Research and development
- Irrigation and water management
We look forward to greeting you at the International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics (ICFAEC 2018) in Alanya, Turkey.
For more information about the conference organization, please check this web page. www.ageconalanya.com
Submission Deadline of Abstracts: January 20th, 2018
Notification of Acceptance/Rejection: With in 4 weeks of submission time
Submission Deadline of Full Papers: February 20th, 2018
Deadline of Early Bird Registration: March 1sh, 2018
ICFAEC Oganizing Committee
Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Faculty of Business, Department of Economics and Finance, 07400 Alanya/Antalya-Turkey, Tel:+ (90) 242 518 21 21-1236, Fax : +(90) 242 518 20 25
Emails: [email protected]
2018 Stanford Anthropology Graduate Conference Proposal
April 27–28, 2018
We are told we live in precarious times. Postcolonial nation-building and post-Cold War democratization have not been one-way tickets to modernity as imagined. The ideology of limitless growth has not brought stable labor systems or economic security for the many, and instead it has brought ecological ruin that threatens everything built upon promises of stability. Yet, such promises persist. As anthropologists, how do we engage with this contradictory moment without reproducing teleological narratives of either progress or decline? Postcolonial perspectives suggest that, on the one hand, a stable future was never a promise accessible to most of the world’s population, and, on the other, such promises have taken multiple forms and stem from different genealogies. The 2018 Anthropology Graduate Conference at Stanford University invites papers that engage with differences within and across states of precarity through the figure of the promise.
Precarity has been theorized, first, as a consequence of global political economic transformations that have largely undone technologies of security and welfare (Standing 2011) and hindered the ability of workers to “transform the present by reference to a projected future” (Bourdieu 1998, 83). Second, precarity has been understood as a politically induced condition that leads to differential exposure to the vulnerabilities of life itself, rendering the more vulnerable among us susceptible to injury, suffering, neglect, and death (Butler 2009). Recent scholarship has bridged these perspectives and refashioned precarity as a site where to explore uneven encounters and unlikely alliances (Allison 2013; Berlant 2011; Stewart 2012; Tsing 2015).
Promise, on the other hand, is a concept that describes a type of contract, a mode of expectation, and an intention. Promises attempt to counteract the effects of unpredictability and vulnerability that the notion of precarity often conveys. And yet, promises are fragile, too. To the extent that promises depend on anticipated futures, they create contested grounds for articulations of truth, performances of certainty, relations of care, and various forms of speculation.
We invite graduate students to submit abstracts that can speak to the interplay between precarity and promise as applied to the following clusters of topics:
- Social movements triggered by unfulfilled promises
- The governance of precarious life
- Trust, debt, and trade networks
- Experience and sociality in contexts of uncertainty
- Promises of science and technology
- Informal economies and subcontracted labor
- Environmental change and political ecologies
- Sovereignty and violence in urban contexts
Application Deadline & Submission
Applications due: Feb 15, 2018 (9:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time)
Notification of acceptance by: March 1, 2018
Full papers due: March 31, 2018
Conference: April 27-28, 2018
Please submit a 300-word abstract with a 100-word short bio to anthro-grad-conference-2[email protected] We welcome individual papers that address the conference theme in any geographical region. Paper presentations should be between 15 and 20 minutes long.
We are able to offer lodging to student presenters in the homes of Stanford students free of charge. We may have exceptional funding for students with unusually high travel costs. If travel costs are an issue, please still submit an abstract and specify what your cost of travel would be to the conference.
Please find below a call for papers for a workshop “Infrastructures of Injustice: Law & Conflict” to take place at St Edmund’s College, University of Cambridge, on October 26–27 2018.
This Cambridge workshop is part of the Cambridge-Singapore-Princeton Network workshop series. The workshop series interrogates the interrelationships between infrastructures and injustice; alert to the manner in which law threads through the material, the conceptual, the ethical, and the affective. We seek work at the junctions of infrastructure and injustice to provoke a reconceptualization of injustice across multiple empirical settings, but particularly within regimes of conflict in the Global South. We intend to achieve this through delving into key ways in which the interactions of human and (in)tangible infrastructure materializes injustice today. Recognizing accelerating trends of securitization, financialization, and calculability, means that interrogating the complicity of infrastructure in the moralities and ethics of contemporary social life is urgent and imperative.
In keeping with the workshop’s push to excavate law’s sometimes subterranean presence, the Cambridge workshop will focus on infrastructures of conflict. The second workshop in Singapore in January 2019 will examine migration infrastructures, and the final workshop in Princeton in April 2019 will draw these two themes together.
The Cambridge workshop operates from the premise that accounts of armed conflict can be productively unpacked through the analytic frameworks of infrastructure, and notions of injustice. Ferguson (2008, 36) rightly says that human, social and material “infrastructure define how war is fought and what is fought over”. The framework of infrastructure is usefully enhanced through grappling with notions of injustice because war is often prompted by actual or perceived injustices. In addition to affecting human, cultural, and social infrastructure, armed conflict also disrupts the functioning of built infrastructure. Armed conflict leads to the unequal provision of multiple forms of infrastructure, or infrastructure deficiency. The space of conflict zones is also the space of “pirate” and “fugitive” infrastructures and territorialities (Simone 2006); elusive infrastructures that are more likely to develop in complex and alternative forms. More broadly, the workshop’s concern will be with the loss of infrastructure in the context of armed conflict and the dehumanization of social capital in the process.
The Cambridge workshop seeks to explore a set of concerns that are framed by but not limited to these questions:
- How are infrastructures of injustice temporally and contextually formed and how do they morph and change dynamically in relation to shifting circumstances of war and conflict? If lawyers simultaneously make law and non-law (Johns 2014, 1), what role does legal infrastructure play in this context?
- What are the infrastructures that sustain, perpetuate and reify injustice(s)? Here we are looking for empirically grounded analyses that deconstruct the ways in which injustice continues to work. We are interested, for example, in intersections of social capital and public infrastructures in cases of armed conflict (eg. hospitals and militaries).
- How are infrastructures of injustice countered, including in situations of conflict? What are the discursive, material and performative strategies of structural subversion and individual resistance? How, for instance, does collective organisation depend on technologies of communication? (eg. underground railroad, safehouses)
- How does infrastructure cope with changing notions of injustice, across time and across place in conflict zones? When do forms of infrastructure become obsolete? Do new or reconfigured infrastructures become necessary to maintain injustice and perpetuate the subjugation of the subjects of injustice?
John Comaroff (Harvard) has confirmed his participation in the Cambridge workshop. Selected speakers will be asked to produce a first draft of their paper three weeks before the event in Cambridge for pre-circulation. Interested participants are expected to cover their own expenses but limited funding may be available to scholars with no funding available to them. There is limited funding available for scholars based in the Global South.
Please note, a selection of presenters from the Cambridge (and Singapore) workshops will be invited to present their revised papers at Princeton University (workshop hosted by Carol Greenhouse) on 26-27 April 2019; travel and accommodation expenses will be covered by Princeton University.
Please send an abstract of 250-300 words and a short biographical statement by May 11, 2018 to Sandra Brunnegger ([email protected]) and Laavanya Kathiravelu ([email protected]) and also state if you will be available for the Princeton meeting in April 2019 if selected.
Association for Applied and Clinical Sociology Annual Conference, October 11-13, 2018. Norfolk, Virginia. Theme: “Translating Complexity into Action.” Open to all applied social scientists, as well as those looking to use their social science skills in applied and clinical areas. Participants include: academics, policy, program and project leaders, business consultants, health care and government professionals. The meeting will be a point of mutual learning and growth among practitioners in the field and professionals challenged with building systems for human improvement. AACS has a reputation as a student-friendly conference for both undergraduates and graduate students, featuring student problem solving, paper competitions, and mentoring opportunities. Papers, full sessions, workshops, and poster submissions welcomed.
Proposals that address teaching with an applied focus are also invited.
Professional development pre-conference (Thursday afternoon) workshops will be included in the conference registration fee.
Deadline: June 1, 2018.
For more information, visit: http://www.aacsnet.net/ and explore the Conferences tab.
Following continuous requests for a Second Call, the CALA, The Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology, to be held in Siem Reap Cambodia, January 23-26, 2019, is now extremely pleased to announce its Second Call.
Despite that the call has been given a deadline, it may close early, should a ceiling be placed on the submission numbers, as we have already received an abundance of submissions, over 400 in the first call. Submissions have until now been high, so please excuse delays in responding to any queries.
Full Title: Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology 1
Short Title: CALA 1 (2019)
Location: Siem Reap, Cambodia
Start Date: 23-Jan-2019 – 26-Jan-2019
Contact: Professor Susan Hagadorn
Meeting Email: [email protected]
Meeting URL: http://cala2019.puc.edu.kh
The Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology, The CALA 1 (2019), in Cambodia, symbolizes a significant movement forward for Linguistic Anthropology, and in problematizing current perspectives and praxis in the field of Asian Linguistic Anthropology.
The CALA seeks to respond to concerns by those within respective fields, Linguistics, Anthropology, Sociolinguistics, Sociology, Cultural studies, and of course Linguistic Anthropology These concerns include the reduced (opportunity for) focus on Asian regions and work by Asian academics, largely contributable to issues of funding and expertise. These concerns also include that academics globally seek to both work on Asian regions and with Asian regions, but impeded by the absence of appropriate networks.
The CALA 1 thus aims to begin an era within which to opportune these academics to transfer knowledge, expertise, and valuable Linguistic and Anthropological Data across the world, through the interpersonal and inter-institutional networks the CALA conferences seek to build.
To ground these efforts, the Conference, at The Paññāsāstra University of Cambodia at the centre, seeks to network a growing number of Institutions globally, to support this much needed project.
The theme for the inaugural CALA is ‘Revitalization and Representation‘, a theme pertinent to the current state of many Asian regions and countries vis-a-vis their global analogues.
Emerging from a complex weaving for received and produced colonializations, the languages and ethnicities within Asia have experienced strong curtailment and denigration, to the point where many have reached near extinction, while others have passed the point of extinction. Here, these languages and ethnicities require urgent revitalization through an anthropological set of approaches, in collaboration with academic, and non-academic, networks globally. Revitalization can be engendered effectively through the complex channels associated with and effected through the extensive and vast work developed in Representation. Cambodia seems to be at the centre of this need for focus, with many ethnicities and their languages currently on the brink of extinction, and with several now having less than ten living speakers.
Though The Paññāsāstra University of Cambodia will host the Inaugural conference in 2019, in Siem Reap, the conference will be hosted by a different Institution globally, annually, while Paññāsāstra remains at the helm of the Conference, so to collaborate with all institutions wishing to involve themselves with and in the CALA network.
We thus welcome you to the CALA 1, in 2019, the Inaugural Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology, and to the CALA in general.
CALL FOR ABSTRACTS
Opens: Friday, October 13, 2017 at midnight (UTC Time)
Closes: Monday, February 9, 2018 at midnight (UTC Time)
NOTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE
By March 10, 2018, midnight (UTC)
Opens: February 10, 2018, midnight (UTC)
Closes: May 14, 2018, midnight (UTC)
Opens: May 15, 2018, midnight (UTC)
Closes: August 25, 2018, midnight (UTC)
Opens: August 26, 2018, midnight (UTC)
Closes: January 26, 2019, (Conference end)
Wednesday January 23rd, 2019
Thursday January 24th, 2019
Friday January 25th, 2019
Saturday January 26th, 2019
- Anthropological linguistics
- Applied sociolinguistics
- Cognitive Anthropology and language
- Critical Linguistic Anthropology
- Post-structuralism and language
- Semiotics and semiology
- Language documentation
- General sociolinguistics
- Language socialization
- Social psychology of language
- Language revitalization
- Ethnography of communication
- Language, community, ethnicity
- Language, dialect, sociolect, genre
- Nonverbal semiotics
- Language and embodiment
- Documenting language
- Ethnographical language work
- Language, gender, sexuality
- Language ideologies
- Narrative and metanarrative
- Language and spatial and temporal frames
- Language minorities and majorities
- Language in real and virtual spaces
Language contact and change
The Second Annual Metropolis North American Migration Policy Forum
Expanding Cooperation on Migration: People, Economy, and Security in the Unites States, Mexico and Canada
The Mexican Secretariat of Foreign Affairs, Mexico City
Longstanding migration flows to and through North America are changing. Shifts in patterns—both driving policy change and responding to it—require fresh thinking across borders. Around the world, proliferating crises have increased the number of refugees and asylum seekers on the move, triggering enhanced border security and vetting protocols in many countries. Within North America, a well-worn north-bound migration pattern is complemented by an increasing southward flow to Mexico and beyond. This stream comprises both those who voluntarily migrate and those being repatriated. And within each North American country, there appear growing concerns about the capacity to receive and integrate new arrivals. Publics unevenly perceive the social and economic benefits of migration and question the government’s ability to effectively manage it. At the same time, under NAFTA, North America has seen reduced barriers to trade, investment and cross-border movement of goods and services. However, the agreement is currently under a contentious renegotiation among the three countries. While migration is not a core NAFTA issue, changes or outright cancellation of the agreement could have migration effects.
The second annual Metropolis North America policy forum builds on the foundational understanding gained at the inaugural forum in Washington, and seeks to identify areas where cooperation is occurring, possible and/or desired. Amidst the backdrop of shifting migration patterns and evolving relationships, approaches can benefit from imagination and should consider actors beyond national governments, including subnational levels and other sectors of society. The key aim of the Mexico City forum is to explore where expanded cooperation across the continent on migration can both promote security and grow the economy in all three countries. Building on innovative approaches and ideas, organizers will seek to bolster a North American migration research agenda that can support these opportunities with insight and analysis from a continental perspective.
Find below some suggested themes:
- Labor Mobility
- Temporary Foreign Workers
- Family Migration
- Economic Migration
- International Students
- Credentials Recognition
- Migration, Human Rights and the Law
- Binational and Multinational Migration Agreements
- Trade and Migration
- Border Security
- Border States and Cities
- Governance of Immigration: The Role of Federal, State/ Provincial Governments
- Immigration and the Specific Role of Cities and Municipalities
- Public Safety
- Settlement and Integration
- Employment Training
- Unaccompanied Minors
- Emigration, Deportation and Return Migration
All sessions must have bilateral or trilateral participation from the United States, Mexico and/or Canada.
Workshops (90 minutes):
Workshops will usually consist of four to a maximum of 5 presentations of approximately 15 minutes each followed by at least 20 minutes of discussion. Workshop coordinators will preside over the session or designate another individual to do so.
Roundtables (90 minutes):
The roundtable format is suitable for more informal discussions of emerging issues or to unpack controversial topics. It is a very effective format for the exchange of information and experiences among a relatively small number of people. The organizer or designated person chairs the roundtable with bi/tri national discussants. An 8 person limit per roundtable discussion is recommended because of the desire to actively engage all participants in the session and the physical arrangement of the tables around which the discussions will take place.
SUBMIT YOUR PROPOSAL
Please note that you will be required to include the following information with your submission:
- Name and contact information
- Format of your session (workshop or roundtable)
- Title of your session
- Names of co-organizers (if applicable)
- Names of presenters including their affiliation, email address and titles of their presentation
- 50-word abstract which will be included in the program (please make sure it is descriptive, but is also formulated to interest as many conference participants as possible)
- 250-word summary for consideration by the Adjudication Committee Your proposal should be emailed to Sarah Kooi ([email protected])
by June 29th, 2018.
Culture, Humanity, and Urban Life
ABOUT THE SERIES:
How are urban processes entangled with human experiences? In this series, scholarly monographs and edited volumes explore this question and illuminate diverse forms of such entanglement through empirically-based research. This series emphasizes anthropological approaches to the study of human life in relation to the urban. It seeks to illuminate experiences and effects of urban cultures and situate specific cases in a comparative set. By exploring the intricacies of human-urban relations, this series contributes to better understanding of the ways that humans particularly conceive of and experience nature, personhood, ethics, culture, and social life.
To submit a manuscript for consideration by Lexington Books, please send:
- a prospectus (see below for details)
- a detailed table of contents
- one or two sample chapters
- your curriculum vitae
If you are proposing a contributed volume, please include titles, affiliations, and brief resumes for each of the contributors, as well as chapter abstracts.
The prospectus should include:
- A description of the book, describing the core themes, arguments, issues, goals, and/or topics of the work, what makes it unique, what questions it seeks to answer, and why you are qualified to write it. (2-5 pages)
- A description of your target audience (undergraduate or graduate students? scholars? professionals?).
- An analysis of competing or similar books (including publishers and dates), indicating distinctive and original elements of your project that set it apart from these other works.
- A list of courses in which your book might be used as a text or supplementary text, indicating the course level at which this book may be used.
- An indication of whether any part of your manuscript has been published previously, and if it is a doctoral dissertation, what changes you are proposing to prepare it for publication.
- The length of the manuscript either as a word count or a page count (12-point type on double-spaced 8.5”×11” pages). Will there be figures, tables, or other non-text material, and, if so, approximately how many? If the text is not complete, please still estimate its final length, not including the non-text material.
- If the manuscript is not complete, an estimation of when it will be finished. Is there a particular date by which you hope the book will be published (due to a historical anniversary, conference, etc.?
- The names of four to seven respected scholars in your field with whom you have no personal or professional relationship. Include their titles, affiliations, e-mail addresses, and/or mailing addresses.
- An indication of whether the manuscript is under consideration by other publishers.
Please do not send your entire manuscript.
ABOUT THE EDITORS:
Jessica Bodoh-Creed is lecturer of anthropology at California State University.
Melissa King is assistant professor of anthropology at San Bernardino Valley College
Leonido Gines Jr. is lecturer of architecture at De La Salle-College of St. Benilde, and founder of studioGINES.
Call for Papers, Posters, and Organized Sessions: 2018 Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society Portland, Oregon
July 26‐29, 2018
MEETING THEME: Science in Society, Society in Science – Toward a 21st Century Model for Social Scientific Research
Growing public skepticism about the value of science and expert knowledge has been a defining characteristic of the early 21st century. Critiques of science come from many sources – populist anti‐elite social movements, academic studies of conventional scientific methods and institutions, and advocates for a more participatory approach to knowledge production. As the distinction between ‘facts’ and ‘values’ has become blurred, the evidence‐base that informs current policy becomes increasingly contested territory. Notably, social scientists have long relied on evidence and scientific research to challenge popular misunderstandings of social problems like poverty, crime, racism, and sexism. At the same time, they have been at the forefront of critiques of the mainstream scientific enterprise and helped pioneer new approaches to research and engagement.
Professional social science societies (like RSS) have an obligation to support those who are studying and developing effective responses to the challenges faced by rural people and places in a globalized world. New models for scientific research will be increasingly important if our efforts are to inform public discourse and shape the development of effective public policies. To do this, we need to reconcile tensions between the desire to retain the power and insights of rigorous scientific methods, and our awareness of the societal biases associated with conventional scientific institutions. At the 2018 Annual Meetings of the Rural Sociological Society, we particularly encourage attendees to present work that explores this vexing and enduring issue, and to provide examples of innovative approaches to applied scientific research on rural topics.
Over the last 80 years, the annual meetings of the RSS have been a venue for the exchange of ideas and information about a wide range of rural issues. Our attendees include faculty and students from diverse colleges and universities, researchers working in government or nonprofit institutions, and rural activists and practitioners. In addition to presentations on the meeting theme, we always invite presentations of research and engagement focused rural people, places and themes from a wide range of disciplinary perspectives.
Abstracts: Abstracts should be approximately 350‐500 words and briefly outline the purpose and theoretical framing of the paper, poster, program, or organized session. Where appropriate, include information about methods, data, and preliminary findings. The deadline for submitting papers, posters and sessions is Thursday, February 1, 2018, 11:59 pm (EST).
To submit, visit the “Annual Meetings” tab on the RSS website, www.ruralsociology.org.
Please contact the Program Chair, Kate MacTavish ([email protected]) or the RSS Business Office ([email protected]) with any questions about submission or to explore ideas for special events at the 2018 Annual Meeting.
Call for papers for the international conference
Changing Global Hierarchies of Value? Museums, artifacts , frames, and flows
University of Copenhagen / National Museum of Denmark, 20–22 August, 2018
Museums are said to classify the world; but the world is changing, and so are the museum worlds and the worlds of arts and artefacts. This conference explores how the world is imagined and classified through the presentation, interpretation and classification of artifacts; and how the global hierarchy of value (cf. Herzfeld 2004) might be changing in through these flows and circulations.
In 2007, the German art historian Hans Belting coined the term “global art” to indicate that contemporary art was no longer the province of artists in the Global North, thus signaling a sea change in the international art world (Belting, in Weibel and Buddensieg 2007). Art historians, prior to Belting had long stipulated that the birth of modern art in 19th and 20th century Europe was partially predicated on inspirations from outside Europe in the guise of Orientalism, Chinoiserie, Japonisme, or “primitivism,” yet these modern artists were almost exclusively from Europe and—later—North America. Non-European artists went largely unnamed and unrecognized, as French surrealist poet André Breton’s famous mur d’atelier revealed. Modern art from the Global South or rapidly modernizing states in Eurasia and East Asia, was often dismissed as derivative of Western art, while contemporary traditional art was considered inauthentic (cf. Kasfir 1992).
Simultaneously, anthropologist Michael Herzfeld (2004) coined the term “global hierarchy of value” to denote the global cultural asymmetry that constituted the cultural successor to the political and military domination of European colonial systems. In the arts, early partial exceptions were Latin America, which—as the historical product of creole nationalisms (cf. Anderson 1982) and hence as a “pseudo-Europe” – saw the emergence of successful artists like Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo and of movements like Brazilian modernism and neo-concretism; and Japan, which experimented with locally inflected, but modern, architecture. The imbalance in the Euro-centered art world changed when the Magiciens de la Terre exhibition was held in Paris (1989) and featured contemporary art by both Western and non-Western—and named—artists in equal numbers, albeit without implying an equal hierarchy of value.
The Magiciens de la Terre exhibition marked the coming out of contemporary artists from Asia, Africa, Latin America and Oceania on the global arts scene, and brought out in their participation in numerous exhibitions such as the Modernités plurielles at the Centre Pompidou in Paris, but also in biennales, art festivals, art fairs, and auctions around the world. Simultaneously, art institutions and events outside of Europe and North America gained in global prominence, by adopting the cultural forms, classificatory devices and exhibitionary technologies developed in Euro-America and applying those in their own contexts and for their own purposes. One could say that while the modern period witnessed the emergence of a global Europe, the current “post-postcolonial” period is marked by the globalization of the other continents—at least in terms of the arts: in that sense it is increasingly possible to speak of global Asia, global Africa, global Latin America as geographic entities that challenge the global hierarchy of value.
At the same time, recent decades have seen the unfolding of increasingly interconnected global networks of production, labor, consumption, and capital accumulation, a process broadly known as globalization. But can we also talk of a globalized taste regime or set of preferences à la Bourdieu? Are recently booming or expanding global players in Asia, Africa, and Latin America reconfiguring the relative value of styles, objects, or traditional artifacts, thereby challenging the old Eurocentric order and organization of the good and the beautiful? Even if the West remains the universal unmarked, attention should be given to the ways in which it is now often amplified, mocked, or ironized by non-Western masters of its artistic, architectural, or artisanal forms. How is globalization affecting existing or emerging museums as economic and commercial players in a world of accelerating mass tourism and brand fixation? How is the complex past of European interaction and Eurocentric notions of cosmopolitanism rethought and exhibited today in postcolonial theaters of historical encounter, exchange, or conflict?
This is the final conference of the project ‘Global Europe: Constituting Europe from the Outside In through Artefacts’ (see http://globaleurope.ku.dk/). The Global Europe project explores how the collection, circulation, classification and museum exhibition of objects define Europe from the outside in during Europe’s present loss of global hegemony—especially in relation to Japan and four non-European BRICS countries (Brazil, China, India, South Africa), in comparison with the early modern period of European ascendancy. This ‘Changing Global Hierarchies of Value?’ conference invites both paper proposals on a range of topics that explore global networks of valuation and validation and their local forms and entanglements in the current period. The papers are expected to be empirically grounded, and may—but do not have to—refer to the five countries targeted by the Global Europe project.
The keynote speech titled Museum Transactions: Negotiating Knowledges, Governing Cultures will be presented by Professor Tony Bennett of the Institute for Culture and Society of the Western Sydney University in Australia. Tony Bennett is the author of—among many other works—The birth of the museum: history, theory, politics (1995), Pasts beyond memories: evolution, museums, colonialism (2004), and Making culture, changing society (2013); and he currently leads the project ‘Museum, Field, Metropolis, Colony: Practices of Social Governance.’ For more information, please see https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/ics/people/researchers/tony_bennett.
The conference is convened by Prof Oscar Salemink, Amélia Siegel Corrêa PhD, Jens Sejrup PhD, Caroline Lillelund and Vibe Nielsen, who make up the research team for the Global Europe project.
GERMAN STUDIES ASSOCIATION: CALL FOR SEMINAR PROPOSALS
The 42nd GSA Conference in Pittsburgh, PA (September 27–30, 2018) will continue to host a series of seminars in addition to conference sessions and roundtables.
Seminars meet for all three days of the conference. They explore new avenues of academic exchange and foster extended discussion, rigorous intellectual debate, and intensified networking. Seminars are typically proposed and led by two to three conveners and they consist of 12 to 20 participants, including scholars from different disciplines and at different career stages. Seminars may enable extended discussion of a recent academic publication; the exploration of a promising new research topic; engagement with pre-circulated papers; an opportunity to debate the work of scholars with different approaches; the coming together of groups of scholars seeking to develop an anthology; or the in-depth discussion of a political or public policy issue, novel, film, poem, artwork, or musical piece.
In order to facilitate extended discussion, seminar conveners and participants should participate in all three seminar meetings. Please note that seminar conveners and seminar applicants who have been accepted for seminar participation will not be allowed to submit a paper in a regular panel session. However, they may take on one additional role in the conference as moderator or commentator on another session independent of their enrollment in a seminar, or they may participate in a roundtable.
Although we accept proposals from conveners who have directed a seminar during the past two consecutive years, we give preference to newcomers and thus encourage the rotation of seminar conveners in similarly-themed seminars. We further recommend that those conveners contact the coordinators of the Interdisciplinary Network Committee, Professors Pamela Potter ([email protected]) and Winson Chu ([email protected]), to establish an official GSA Network on their topic.
The application process has two steps. Initially, we invite you to submit a preliminary proposal that includes the following items:
- Names of conveners
- A 150-word description of the seminar’s subject (which will eventually be used in the call for participants, the printed program, and the online program/mobile app)
- A 50-word description of the format of the seminar (which will also appear in the call for participants, etc.)
These items are due by November 13, 2017.
Please submit your application online at https://www.xcdsystem.com/gsa. Your username and password are the same ones you use to log in to your GSA profile at https://thegsa.org/members/profile. Please note that you must be a current member of the GSA to submit a proposal. If you need your password reset, please contact Ms. Ursula Gray ([email protected]) at Johns Hopkins University Press. If technical questions or problems arise with the submission interface itself, please contact Elizabeth Fulton at [email protected].
At this point, the GSA Seminar Committee will provide suggestions and assistance for the final submission, which is due by December 13, 2017. The committee will then review seminar proposals and post a list of approved seminars and their topics on the GSA website by early January 2018.
The GSA Seminar Committee consists of:
Margaret Eleanor Menninger (Texas State University) | [email protected] (Chair)
Maria Mitchell (Franklin & Marshall College) | [email protected]
Faye Stewart (Georgia State University) | [email protected]